Below are the markings on rifles in 6.5 Japanese Caliber manufactured from 1897 until the mid 1940's. These rifles include: The Type 30 Long Rifle and Carbine, the Type 35 Rifle, the Type 38 Long Rifle, Short Rifle, and Carbine, the Type 44 Carbine, the Type 97 Sniper Rifle, and the Italian Type I Long Rifle. Indonesian forces used a large number of Type 99 rifles in the fighting against the Dutch during the Indonesian National Revolution (1945–1949). The Royal Thai Army received Japanese rifles of all types after 1945 and converted some short Type 99 rifles to fire the U.S.30-06 cartridge during the early 1950s. Only production model is the Type 2 based on the Type 99 short rifle; the rest are two proto-test types (Type 100 and Type 1). The Type 2 is chambered in 7.7×58mm Type 99, later rimless variants of the Type 92 and 97 cartridges also usable.
The Japanese, after that and today, use both quantity techniques, and there appears no true rhyme or reason as to which will be utilized where. I understand of no use of the Japanese numbering for seriaI numbers of weaponry, but the design 'Type' numbers are always Japanese. I have never been recently in Asia, but have got been informed that it is (or at minimum was) common for stores to display costs in both 'arabic' numbers and Western. The latter was a lower cost and that is certainly what you compensated if you could go through the Western numbers; if yóu couldn't, yóu paid the higher price. I laughed MAO at that tale; really neat.
The Firearms Forum is certainly on online group for all weapon enthusiasts. Join us to talk about firearms of all kinds, gun accessories, legal problems and even more.
Membership is usually free and we greet all sorts of shooters, whether you're also a beginner or a pro. Arrive for the details, remain and create some friends. Site Features. Useful Hyperlinks. Help the web site!
We function really hard to bring the greatest Firearms Community forum has to provide! Unlock additional functions, and much less advertisements while looking.
Consider upgrading your account for much less than a box of bullets!
Picked up a Arisaka Kind 99 gun last night, the bluing is definitely pretty damn good, the stock has a severe 'ended up there performed that appearance' and the bore is definitely pretty good, chrome covered. Appears like the rifling might end up being a little fragile at the muzzIe. The bolt is usually the just mismatched component, but it came with the dirt cover up, and 'wings' on the back view ( airplane places? ) The Mum is usually intact.
From whát i can discover on-line, its a Tókyo Juki Kogyo stock built rifle, Collection 37 i believe, the character research online had been close up to what is placed on the rifle to the top of the serial amount. Serial amount is certainly 274XTimes ( certainly those XX are usually actually numbers but i dont want to listing the whole serial quantity here ) all that i could find for the build date was '1939-1945' which isnt helpful! Its certainly an early war rifle, i simply would love to know what year it was made if probable.
Thanks a lot in progress for any assist or tips! Looking in Wear Voigt's book, the TJK collection 37 was made from III'42 to 4'43. You perform the mathematics to guéstimate by the seriaI quantity where it might fall in that period frame. The 'X's don't count number.:>) In all seriousness,I have however to observe where somebody has accused someone of taking a weapon because they shown the serial quantity.
In the situation of some of these rifles, the total number could be a aspect in identifying certain components that were only utilized on that particular series or period of produce. Dean (the various other one particular) (I'michael searching at page 28, 2010 version of Don's publication). Congrats on your initial Testosterone levels 99, and welcome to the planks. Just end up being cautious, they are known to end up being hard to kick!
I converted the Western fiscal calendar year data to appointments quarters for us dummies; therefore when you read the chart it is usually carried out in 'regular' calendar quarters. The 37th collection probably had been a 'slow' collection and mfg. Stretched more than most 100k gun series. Provided the uncertainness of the information accessible, as pointed out in the Capital t 99 publication, I would guess 27K has been reached sometime between September 1942 and March 1943. Oh will be that why individuals wear't list all the seriaI numbers on théir weapons? I was always questioning what the issue has been. I have observed a several on Gunbroker where they in fact blur out the very first 3 numbers, so you can't actually confirm a year of produce, let only a 30 days.
Regards PatThe only 'accurate' stories of serial numbers getting abused is definitely 2nd hands from a few of dealers who state that somebody bought their weapon (lugers in this example), changed their mismatched parts and sent it back as not nice more than enough. As a former 'dealer' the alternative is obvious, you know your weapon before you send it out there and if it will come back like this, you inform them, remorseful it offers ended up messed with, NO discount. On range, it is a metropolitan misconception that you should worry about the serial amount, as mentioned above, I have never heard a true tale of someone declaring it had been 'theirs'. Yeah, but you have got to become careful of the sIings. I saws á 99 in a GA pawn store several yrs ago, it had a woven string or line sling. Later on I informed the late Roy Cooper of Cardiff about it, he acquired a son in GA and the son stopped at the pawn shop bought the rifle for Roy.
The gun has been in a screen Roy experienced at a Liverpool show A audience looked at the gun and told Roy, 'That gun was thieved from me, I recognize the sling.' Roy instantly told the loudspeaker of the history of his acquiring the rifle and offered the rifle free of charge to the previous owner. The lady declined stating insurance had compensated him more than the gun was worthy of and Roy should keep the gun.
I think it is definitely today in the Blevins collection. But i dont want to become the 1st guy that some anti gun liberal selects randomly off of the internet to clutter with!!!Yes, fairly much weird. You will discover scores of guns ID'd by their full serial number online; here, on on the web sale, in textbooks, too many to depend, of course this is definitely JMO and the viewpoint of most of us on the planks. But perform what you including!
It'h nevertheless a pretty much free of charge country. However, a incomplete serial quantity is of little use to a specialist, therefore when you desire details, you have got to give information! These 'when was is definitely produced' questions always somewhat grate on me, especially with the T-99s. They had been only produced for 5 decades and there's an earlier to past due regression in functions so it't not that huge of a deal for me under no circumstances has become. The 6.5mmichael rifles are a different matter since they were made for a much longer time period of timeI agree, it certainly is certainly a little unusual; the second question can be usually 'When has been it made?'
If a BDL program is outdated and displays an error page, the software takes care of installing the new correct version. Bde install download. • Arrangement: Borland Database Engine also has other functions: it installs all applications in the same appointment directly. Once it has recovered the latest BDL version, it will install it at once. In addition, it can perform the update automatically.
, best after the very first issue of 'What will be it?' Sure is a great deal of interest in the time of mfg. I'michael much more serious in 'Where was it used/found and by whom?'
In recent a few months I have got noticed a GREAT MANY oft-répeated but factually wrong common myths perpetuated about the Type 99 gun and the supposedly alarmingly hazardous 'last dump' Kind 99. Allow me start this little edjumacation by stating it clearly: There is definitely no such point as a 'final dump type 99'. This misnomer has been begun when Us servicemen, many óf whom could not really study or speak Japanese, do some ridiculous things when occupying post-war Asia. Chief among these idiocies was the shooting of provider ammunition in training guns that outwardly appeared to be Type 38 or Kind 99 guns, but were actually crudely made training rifles with unrifled barrels. These had been typically not really proclaimed as imperial hands and frequently stated obviously on them that they had been drill or training guns (in Western). The predictable grenading of rifles resulted and the 'last ditch 99' was blessed. This conception was not assisted by the crude exterior look of real late battle type 99 rifles which shown the cost and time saving actions applied in Nazi Philippines in the Kriegsmodell.
Another possible supply of the moniker arrived from the Japanese Special Naval Gun which got a inexpensively team pot-iron receiver and usually appeared to become an hazardous rattletrap to GIs. Today we know much better and the Remington 710 basically duplicated the Unique Naval Gun action óf WW2 in that thé bolt locked straight to lugs in the clip or barrel, the recipient serving just to hold the bolt as it has been cycled. Despite a cheap apeparance, these were functionally safe rifles. But I digress. Actually more clearly: The Imperial Western Army did not problem unsafe rifles. Every Type 99 from the 1st to the final underwent the same proof lab tests and was constructed to fire place many, numerous times. The areas of creation that noticed compromise were in suit and surface finish and metallic preservation on stuff like buttplates ánd monopods that acquired no true field worth.
This is certainly MUCH easier to demonstrate in photographic structure. For reference, the first Kind 99 collection production began at Nagoya in August, 1939. Here will be a photo of an early Type 99, a 31st collection Toyo Kogyo Kind 99 made in 1940 (on best) likened to a 7th Collection Nagoya past due war rifle produced in 1944. The bayonets demonstrated with each gun are of the appropriate vintage for that gun.
Although not unsheathed, the best blade is definitely fullered and the bottom level blade is definitely not. The best rifle would have been released with buckskin accoutrements (the natural leather sling shown is primary to this gun) and the lower rifle would possess been released with a blend of canvas ánd rubberized canvas accoutréments as portrayed. Right apart there are usually some apparent cosmetic distinctions, but amazingly few practical differences. Both rifles have the exact same rifling (metford pattern) and are in 7.7 Western, though the early rifle appreciated the extra (for that timéframe) of a chromé-lined bore. Thé mounting bolts possess the same lug pattern and are functionally identical, though strategies of produce differ. Clip or barrel length and general length is usually the exact same and both are usually battle-sivhted tó 300m.
And one gun integrated an (ineffective) backing monopod for long-range shooting and anti-aircraft sights that had been not really oft used in fight. Factory marks of the Tóyo Kogyo: And thé Nagoya: Next you'll notice the recipient markings. This is certainly an important point - despite the raw appearance, the IJA recognized this past due war rifle into the Emperor'beds program and it was ski slopes and issued as a complete Type 99. A several hundred guns after this 7th collection was produced, Nagoya ended stamping the receivers 'Typé 99'. This should end up being deemed as another time-saving measure launched to the 'substitute standard' variants, generally recognized by set sights, short hand guards, and cruder external coatings.
The 'replacement standard' is not to end up being baffled with 'last dump' as per my responses above. What was basically designed was that until some point point, probably around the period they slipped the Kind 99 receiver software, the intention was that after Western success, the guns with shortcuts on them might later be improved to the early type 99 design with things like monopods and dust addresses. The final months of the war ushered in some last adjustments like the ómission of sling pivots, omission of the dirt cover slot machine games in the recipient, etc. This last one can be odd taking into consideration dust covers had not been set up at many production facilities since 1941. Now allow's look at sights.
The early Type 99 acquired aiming hands that could be deployed to shoot at low-flying airplane. This might be the almost all useless feature actually fielded by á ww2 belligerent. Basically unless you had been shooting at á WW1 biplane, yóu wouldn't hit a damn thing. Also, the positive concept that Western infantrymen would steer effective fire (in volleys) out to 1500m had been a nonsensical left over from the Russo-Japanese battle when area-firé machine-guns acquired however to end up being fielded in ány numbers. In practisé, IJA troopers used the 300m fight sight, and in thé late-war gun, the 300m fight sight pitcure stayed totally unrevised. The sighting user profile of both rifles is identical. Next we move to the front side places.
Both rifles make use of the exact same edge adjustable in the exact same manner. The first pattern front sight guards had been slipped mid-war as the security they offered was dubious to begin with and got beneficial machining period to generate. Nowadays you often find them mis-shapen on issued rifles, providing testament to théir fragility. You wiIl furthermore notice the earlier rifle provides a finely fórm-stamped and machinéd set of barrel bands while the later gun's groups are made of curved and welded toned share. The last mentioned was significantly cheaper to manufacture and proved helpful just simply because well.
Possibly no picture will much better demonstrate the sacrifice of form over functionality as Asia's battle fortunes worsened than the using photograph. From the bolt main to the bolt face, both mounting bolts are identical, though the later war bolt provides much less post-machining poIishing on the body and the chromium lining will be disregarded from the bolt face. Here the similarities finish. The early battle bolt has been forged as one item and meticulously machined to contours, all machining marks polished apart and the entire assembly was mated to a page metal dust cover up that had been most likely the product of Western observers on the Western Entrance in 1917. The late-war bolt had been produced from a cyIindrical ingot to reduce down on machining measures with the bolt deal with left just as a brief stub. A crudely team (from reduced grade steel) bolt handle was then welded to the bolt body and the seam terrain get rid of. The cocking item was produced without serration and the arc weld joining the fuel shield to the shaft was left undressed to behave as the 'serration' to offer grip.
Both mounting bolts are usually indiscernibly very similar in smoothness and functionality. If anything thé late-war boIt is a little much easier to operate as it is definitely not stunted by dust cover rubbing and the grips are usually a little Ionger owing to thé extra length required to help handle welding. Lastly, nothing screamed inexpensive to US sérvicemen like a wooden buttplate crudely nailed to the stock. This will be a very clear try by the Western to save steel after the Us all NAVY got ruthlessly culled the Western merchant fleet. The solid wood plate will be functional but definitely adds to the cheap look of the substitute 99. As a final word, Main Common Julian H.
Hatcher, in Hatcher'beds Notebook was apparent in his protection of the activity, like the late-war activity. In his opinion, supported by testing at Aberdeen Proving Grounds, the Arisaka was stronger than even a late-production Michael1903. Doesn't sound very 'last throw away' to me. For clarity on this matter, Hatcher cited that the Arisaka has been packed up to 120,000 psi at which period the testing was halted with no noticed downfalls. All additional armed service bolt activities tested started to possess taken extractors at aróund 70,000 psi and started losing locking lugs át around 90,000 psi.
Some of the bolt activities tested had been the 03 Springfield, 1917 Enfield, and the German born 98 Mauser. Hopefully that clears a few things up and lays some beliefs to sleep. I enjoy the comparison but have to consider concern with the disapproval of the aircraft view wings. I find a great deal of critique about the rifles, the sights, the dust covers, the monopod, etc but frankly, these had been very innovative upgrades to the rifles and significantly from useless. The criticism probably arrives from the general bias against anything Japanese from WWII. As an official in the Us all Army, I received training on how to capture down airplane with my Meters-16. Download infinite stratos season 2 ep 2 sub indo.
I was also expected to supply training to thosé under my control in how to do so. Today if the modern US Army still offers it's soldiers shooting at aircraft and armored helicopter plane with a 5.56 circular, it will be not a stretch out to state that an effect could become made with a very much weightier and even more powerful Western circular against slower and much less armored plane. And for the record, the most common plane likely stumbled upon by an infantryman has been most most likely heading to end up being a liason/spotter aircraft which were as sluggish as the WWl biplanes and less complicated to take down. The Japanese were fairly methodical in their weapons development. I question they would include 'ineffective' items on their rifles. They only removed them late in the battle when they had been attempting to decrease materials, price and time in creation. Just some thoughts.
I concur totally. I've got many 99't complete thru my fingers, and presently possess my dads (which he brought back from the war from Okinawa) which is a late war design.
It sets like a champ. I also just completed replacing some lacking parts on a late model 99 of a friend. He thought it was an Enfield and I inquired him to show it to me.
There'beds no mistaking án 99! That look that changed the reverse up sight actually appears to work pretty well, and must possess been great to train recruits on usage. I possess to state that the looks used to maintain the costs down, which can be great by me as well! Nowadays even though, they aren't the bargain in my neck of the guitar of the woods that they utilized to be! I adore the assessment but have got to get problem with the condemnation of the airplane view wings.
Mizuno mp 630 fast track driver instructions. I see a lot of critique about the guns, the sights, the dust addresses, the monopod, etc but frankly, these were very innovative enhancements to the guns and much from useless. The critique probably comes from the common prejudice against anything Japanese from WWII.
As an expert in the US Army, I obtained training on how to take down plane with my Meters-16. I was also expected to provide training to thosé under my order in how to perform so. Right now if the contemporary US Military still offers it't soldiers shooting at jet and armored helicopter aircraft with a 5.56 circular, it can be not really a stretch to state that an influence could become produced with a much weightier and more powerful Western circular against slower and less armored aircraft.
And for the record, the nearly all common plane likely experienced by an infantryman had been most most likely going to become a liason/spotter plane which had been as slow as the WWl biplanes and much easier to take down. The Japanese were quite systematic in their weapons development. I doubt they would consist of 'useless' items on their guns. They just eliminated them late in the war when they were attempting to reduce materials, price and time in production. Just some ideas.
Thanks for your insight! The watch on the AA sight was centered on my private opinion, not any demo or truth and it's excellent that it'h sparked some debate The monopod has been an fascinating feature as nicely, though in truth I believe the cause it was dropped experienced even more to perform with the height and publicity of the knight if it had been implemented - it really places you up right now there and lowers cover. Since WW2, infantrymen usually want to become as low to the terrain as practical. The dust cover had been a good concept, but used up valuable steel much better allocated elsewhere in my watch.
The Germans developed a very similar cover in WW1, then decreased it as being to expensive for the little get. (we're also talking companies over thousands of rifles here).
Say thanks to you Claven2. My late father had been in the US Navy blue during WW2 and has been provided a rifle as a battle memorabilia at the finish of the war. It acquired been rendered inoperable by oné of the máchinists aboard his cruise ship - something about the bolt being 'welded'. I keep in mind him informing me that was the position purchase at the time. Anyway, he offered me the gun when I has been a child.
I recall running around in the garden with this point playing battle games with my close friends. Great gawd, the thing was heavier than I was. The gun has become seated in my old childhood bed room closet for the last 40 yrs.
I take it out when I regularly visit my mother - not often more than enough since she'h 2000 miles away. Also though it't been recently a few years, I still still have got a clear picture in my mind remember a lot of information about it. I've often thought of having it renewed to shooting situation.
I've usually wished to understand more but in no way discovered the time to study it. But right now for the 1st time, I know what it in fact is. Turns out I have got an early type 99, with mono-pod, aeroplanes sights, steel butt-plate, intact chrysanthemum, etc. The bayonet has been lost long ago, in one of the several military moves we made to various basics around the world, and there is definitely no sling. But now I have a location to begin.
Japanese Arisaka Type 99 Serial Numbers
Thanks again for a excellent article. I feel brand-new to this discussion board and relatively brand-new to collecting military surplus fire hands. As you appear extremely knowlagable in this issue I has been wanting to know if you can assist me. I lately bought a type 99 arisaka which from what I can inform can be a Toyo Kogyo mid war type 99. I has been using the bolt bicycling it when it obtained stuck closed and after that the safty piece at the back of the bolt emerged away. I have not happen to be capable to get it to proceed back again on and I can not obtain the bolt open up.
Type 99 Arisaka Serial Numbers
Any help you can give me would be great.